"I do not measure the success of our work in the watchmen on the streets. I do not measure it in our new factories, nor do I measure it in our new mines that we build, nor in the divisions we set up, but at the top of the assessment of this success stands the German child, sees the German youth. When that happens, then I know that my people will not perish and our work will not have been in vain."
Adolf Hitler
1. Laws of Life
"By attempting to rise up against the iron logic of nature, man enters into a struggle with the principles upon which he himself owes his existence as a human being." (Adolf Hitler, "Mein Kampf.")
The human mind has succeeded in gaining insight into many laws of nature.
Law of Struggle — Evolution.
Our knowledge of the development of life on Earth largely comes from deposits and fossils. We find them in the layers of our Earth's crust that are accessible to us. Investigations repeatedly reveal: in the oldest layers of the Earth's crust, very simple, lowly forms appear. In later layers, we find more highly developed organisms, and finally, in the youngest layers, the most highly developed organisms.
Development means change, growth, reproduction, expansion, etc. Every development requires immense periods of time. It knows no standstill. The life of the individual being disappears completely in the course of the species' development, and we cannot expect to see development in our own short existence. Each developmental process reaches a certain stage or height. Thus, this process is by no means complete but continues incessantly.
How does nature intervene in these processes? If we walk through the world with open eyes, we see that there is fierce struggle everywhere. A struggle for existence.
Struggle is a fundamental law of nature.
Everything must be fought for: food, land, etc. One plant seeks to displace another from the same habitat, animal fights against animal. The deeper meaning of this eternal, apparent struggle of annihilation is:
Everything weak, inferior is destroyed. Only the strong and vigorous survive for reproduction.
The goal is therefore a selection upwards, the preservation of the best.
We just need to recognize natural processes correctly and act accordingly. What our ancestors instinctively grasped because they were much more connected to nature must become our common heritage again. It is not about the individual but about the promotion and preservation of the species.
In a National Socialist context, this means:
"Common good before self-interest" or "The individual is nothing, the volk, the race are everything."
Every nation needs space to live. Throughout world history, the struggle for living space will always take place. The growing, strong nation alone has the moral right to expand its living space and, if necessary, to fight for it.
Law of Fertility
Animals and plants produce far more offspring than is necessary for the preservation of their species.
Here are some examples:
The fruit of our poppy contains around 4000 seeds. If all seeds were to develop and produce new fruit after 5 years, there would be 256,000,000,000,000 poppy plants. Already in the sixth year, the entire Earth's surface would not be sufficient to accommodate all these plants.
A single female cod contains 3 to 4 million eggs. After just a few generations, if all offspring were to emerge, all bodies of water on Earth would be filled with them. Such examples can be expanded indefinitely.
The tremendous fertility that we encounter in nature time and again undergoes the necessary restriction through the destruction of a large number of individual beings. The prospects for survival are not equal for all living beings.
However, fertility is a prerequisite for ensuring that a sufficient number of living beings remain to prevent the extinction of the species.
Without fertility, there is no evolution.
The birth rate will also determine our future. The number of cradles must be far greater than the number of coffins. Then we will be able to successfully resist all impending dangers and implement that right which is bestowed upon us due to our leading position in Europe.
Law of Selection.
Under natural conditions, selection operates in a very different way than in a cultivated state. This is because the means by which selection occurs in nature are different from the methods employed in selection through cultivation.
We distinguish between:
1. Natural selection.
2. Artificial selection.
In nature, selection is driven by the struggle for existence. Hereditary changes are rare in "wild" forms. Non-adaptive variations that are not conducive to further survival are immediately eliminated because they no longer correspond to the conditions of existence.
For example: In a field of poppies, suddenly early-maturing forms appear. What happens? Long before maturity, the seed pods burst open. The seeds fall to the ground and are destroyed during the next cultivation.
Or: Suddenly, among the field hares, white-haired forms—called albinos—appear. They stand out conspicuously from their surroundings. They are the first of their kind to become visible to predators and fall victim to them.
Natural selection practically eliminates any deterioration of the genetic material. In a cultivated state, under the protection of humans, defective organisms are preserved. The breeder only thinks about beneficial changes without regard for the preservation of the breed. The goal of artificial selection does not always coincide with that of natural selection, which seeks only to ensure the continued existence of the species.
Humans have succeeded in breeding a large number of animal and plant breeds that meet their requirements. If such cultivated forms are left to nature, they perish in a short time. Thus, seedless fruit varieties can only be maintained through grafting or cuttings.
Our chicken and goose breeds have lost their essential ability to fly under natural conditions due to their increase in weight.
We must never apply the concept of "struggle for existence" to economic life. We understand it as a purely biological fact.
Artificial, often unnatural selection occurs on a large scale in every civilized nation. Mentally deficient individuals, criminals, and the sick are often spared from decline. Thus, the poor genetic material is not only preserved but also passed on to future generations. Particularly, medical advancements prevent the kind of selection that was once applicable to humans. In the case of nature-bound volk of simpler civilization, as we must imagine our ancestors, the same selective forces as in animals were at work. This selection has elevated humans. However, the rise of culture and especially civilization caused the laws of nature to be forgotten. While humans may postpone their effects, they can never abolish them. Just as numerous species of animals and plants have been extinguished throughout the history of our Earth, whole peoples have been destroyed because they violated the laws of nature.
In the following, we will present means and methods that have logically already been undertaken in the National Socialist state to transform the ongoing decline of our volk into an ascent.
Adaptation — Limits of Environmental Influences.
The environment places certain demands on every individual being. Those who are not up to these demands or cannot overcome them will be destroyed or must seek a more suitable environment. The environment is directly involved in the selection process. This does not always proceed in the direction of improvement. We know examples of the opposite:
The giant deer that once lived in our region developed increasingly large antlers over many generations. Eventually, the antler tips were several meters apart. This development proved fatal for the species. The animals could no longer hide in the protective forest, as they got stuck between the trees with their antlers. In open terrain, they became easier prey for their enemies. They died out.
External influences can alter the appearance of plants, animals, and humans.
The edelweiss, as a high-altitude plant, is very well adapted to its habitat. Often anchored only in rock crevices, it maintains its existence. The hairy, narrow leaves manage with small amounts of water. The flowering and fruiting periods are adapted to the short periods of fine weather. When seeds of the mountain form are transplanted to the valley, the edelweiss grows differently under the changed conditions. The hairiness decreases, the leaves become wider, and the whole plant grows taller. However, seeds of this lowland form revert to the alpine appearance in the mountains.
An example from the animal kingdom: If two pigs from the same litter are raised under different nutritional conditions, the differences become evident in a short time. The well-nourished animal will soon surpass the poorly nourished one in size and weight. When such differently appearing animals are used for further breeding, their offspring show no significant differences under normal conditions.
The same principles apply to humans, both physically and mentally. Through physical exercise, certain organs can be developed beyond average; through practice, skills can be acquired, and through diligence, appropriate knowledge. However, the innate abilities must always be present; the environment exerts the selective influence.
The environment may stimulate or inhibit. However, it does not alter the genetic makeup.
Volk and Race
"What is not good race in this world is chaff." (Adolf Hitler, "Mein Kampf.")
What is a volk? Every volk represents a visibly outward community. The same blood, the same land, the same language. Customs, culture, and history are inseparable bonds.
"The volk are the bloodstream that comes from eternity and leads into eternity." The living generation is just one link in the chain that begins with the earliest ancestors and moves into the future with subsequent generations.
Together, they all form the community of the volk. The existence of the individual is only purposeful when intimately connected with the entirety of the volk.
The living bearers of the blood of this community bear the responsibility for shaping the future generations.
Every volk has its own ethnic character. The roots of ethnic character are anchored in the racial composition of the volk.
A volk is both a community of descent and destiny.
What is race? The large number of living beings reveals groups that more or less resemble each other and show similar physical characteristics. They possess the same essence. We call such groups of living beings "species."
Each of us knows that the term "dogs" or "cats" refers to a specific species of animal, whose grouping by us is based on common physical and characteristic features.
This agreement applies within a species to many, but not all characteristics. Therefore, further subdivision of species is necessary: into subspecies or races. We easily distinguish between individual dog breeds and know that, apart from the physical differences, dachshunds and Saint Bernards, German Shepherds and hunting dogs possess certain racial characteristics and are therefore specifically bred by humans for certain services.
The humanity living today forms a "species". Humans are fertile with each other. When we consider and compare a white person, a black person, or a Mongolian, it becomes immediately clear that it is not sufficient to speak simply of the "human" species, but rather that a subdivision into human races must be made for an accurate assessment.
We can distinguish the individual races by the differences they possess in terms of body and character. Each race has certain characteristics and traits that are unique to it. These racial characteristics are inherited by the offspring.
Each race has a specific, shared genetic heritage.
As long as a race remains pure, this genetic heritage passes from one generation to the next. Contact with foreign races leads to mixtures with increasingly detrimental consequences. Therefore, it is necessary that racial consciousness be raised among volk of the same race, and the dangers of racial mixing be properly recognized.
Thus, race is a group of living beings distinguished by the common possession of certain hereditary characteristics. They always reproduce their own kind.
Every nation has evolved into a unity of life from certain races. The predominant race determines the ethnic character and acts as an immutable heritage within it. The German volk are characterized by the predominant Nordic race.
The significance of races.
Race is based on shared genetic material. This determines the particular physical and mental-spiritual performance capability. There are races that can create high cultures, and there are those that will never rise up on their own. There are races with a heroic attitude and those without courage. Cultural achievements are exclusively creations of high-quality races. People of the same race are connected by a common bloodline.
The ascent of humanity follows or ceases with the preservation of the purity and strength of the culture-creating races. Every race mixing means a decrease in value for the more valuable race.
The emergence of races.
The major races have evolved over long periods in isolated habitats. Massive natural boundaries created a series of settlement areas. Originally, due to the small number of ancestors, the same environment, and its influences, the people of the same settlement area were very similar in every respect. Races are the result of evolution.
This process extends over immense periods and, as long as a race exists, is constantly in flux, subject to the laws of nature. However, we should not expect to see progress in this development within the short time frames of a few generations.
The origin and ancestry of the Nordic race.
The homeland of the Nordic race lies in ice-age Western, Northwestern, and Central Europe (Fig. 1). The core area of the Nordic race includes the regions of present-day Thuringia, the North Sea, the Baltic Sea, Jutland, and southern Scandinavia. The formation of Nordic characteristics represents a selection process by the Nordic climate. The Nordic race is a product of breeding and selection by its environment. The sun-poor, cool, and humid climate contributed to shaping the Nordic volk. In this region, dark-skinned individuals were eradicated, while lighter forms were preserved (Fig. 2).
Early on, the Nordic volk were settled farmers. They invented the plow, which later other peoples adopted, engaged in cereal cultivation, and bred domestic animals. The initially immense population growth of this Nordic population led to a new, necessary acquisition of territory and resulted in wave after wave flowing into adjacent areas: into the European region and into vast parts of Asia. The stamp of Nordic civilization was, albeit often only temporarily, imposed on the indigenous population of each area.
Not: "From the East came the light," as previously claimed by science, but: "From the North comes the strength!"
Fig. 1. The largest and final glaciation of Europe.
As a result of a significant climate deterioration, a strong glaciation occurred in Europe. Massive ice masses from Scandinavia advanced over the North Sea and the Baltic Sea. All life was buried under a thousand meters thick ice sheet or had to retreat to the ice-free areas.
The second center of glaciation was the Alps. Large glacier streams pushed forward from them. The Salzach and Inn glaciers reached as far as Braunau, and the Isar glacier almost reached Munich.
Even today, we see witnesses of this former glaciation in northern Germany in the form of erratic boulders, massive stone blocks carried by the glaciers from Scandinavia.
Several climate fluctuations have repeatedly pushed back the glaciers and allowed them to advance again (interglacial periods).
Only after the final fading of the cold period was the northern region also free for permanent settlement by plants, animals, and humans.
Fig. 2. The core area of the Nordic race.
Racial characteristics.
The physical, mental, and emotional traits that are inherited are called racial characteristics.
The most important physical racial characteristics:
- Body structure
- Proportions of limbs
- Skull shape (long, medium, short skull)
- Facial shape (narrow, wide face)
- Jaw position
- Shape of the nose
- Color of the eyes, skin, and hair.
Mental and emotional racial characteristics:
Deeds and achievements are a visible expression of the mental and emotional attitude. Movement and gesture are the forms through which the experiences of the individual are conveyed to us.
The totality of mental characteristics is referred to as racial soul.
Human races are physically and mentally different. If there were only physical differences, then the question of racial affiliation would be quite insignificant. The sum of all perceivable traits, characteristics, and abilities of humans gives us their appearance.
The sum of all genetic traits that make up their essence constitutes their genetic profile.
These traits manifest externally to varying degrees. Often, it is extremely difficult to infer the mental predisposition from the appearance alone. This circumstance applies especially to those peoples in whose formation various races are involved. Thus, an outwardly different person can easily have the mental and emotional characteristics of a Nordic person, and vice versa.
The genetic profile of a person is far more important than their appearance.
When examining the individual countries of Europe for their racial composition, one first notices that almost all states have the same races represented. We find the Nordic race not only in Germany, the Scandinavian countries, England, and Holland, but also in Russia, Italy, France, Spain, etc. We also find, for example, Eastern people in various European countries. Ultimately, the racial overall assessment of a people does not depend on this fact. Rather, it concerns the numerical proportion of the individual races in the respective people.
And it is clear: In terms of the Nordic proportion, the Reich marches far ahead of all other nations.
By natural right, Germany can claim leadership of the Nordic-Germanic peoples for itself.
Races of the German People.
Despite the often strong mixing and intermingling of races in the various regions of the Reich, we find individual races more pronounced in different parts of Germany.
There are areas where tall stature, narrow faces, and light hair, eyes, and skin color prevail. In some parts, stocky, round-headed people with broad faces, brown eyes, brown to black hair, and dark skin color predominate.
In other areas of the Reich, however, we find tall, short-headed people with narrow faces, large noses, brown eyes, and black hair.
Or in one region, the features predominate: medium height, stocky body, short head, broad face with prominent cheekbones, blonde hair, and light eyes.
In the German people, predominantly the following races are represented:
1. Nordic race
2. Falish race
3. Dinaric race
4. Western race
5. East Baltic race
6. Eastic race
However, the Nordic race is more or less strongly represented in all regions of the Reich. Many people in our nation cannot be completely assigned to one race or another. In every nation, alongside pure representatives, the individual races are found in a more or less mixed form.
In the German people, Nordic heritage predominates. The Nordic race is not only the predominant race but also genetically present in almost all German individuals. It is simultaneously the inseparable bond that, along with the common homeland, binds our entire nation for better or for worse.
"Blood and soil" are not empty concepts but our destiny.
Nordic Race
The main distribution area of the Nordic race is around the North and Baltic Seas, Northern Germany, Denmark, Scandinavia, England, and Holland. To the south, the Nordic race has penetrated deep into Central Europe.
The proportion of Nordic blood in the genetic makeup of the German people is around 50%. Furthermore, genealogy teaches us that every German carries Nordic blood within them.
The German people are, in the truest sense of the word, a community of blood. History, based on racial knowledge, has long proven that the Nordic race contributes a much stronger share of outstanding individuals than other races. The Nordic race is the bearer of the high talent of the German people. Great achievements in all fields have made them the leading race of humanity. There is no other human race that has produced so many outstanding intellectual leaders, military commanders, and statesmen. Even foreign race researchers have had to admit that the significance of peoples depends on the proportion of Nordic blood (Fig. 3).
In bold endeavor, the Nordic people conquered vast territories, established states, and created cultures. As early as the year 1000, Vikings landed in America. The exploration of entire continents was guided by the Nordic spirit.
The migration of the northern Indo-Germanic peoples around 3000-1800 BCE.
Fig. 3. The Nordic people as creators of the highest culture. Already in the third millennium BCE, Nordic people founded the Aryan culture in India and laid the foundation for the expansion of power in Persia. Nordic blood shaped the cultures of Greece and the Roman Empire.
One of the most prominent characteristics of the Nordic race is self-discipline. Nordic boldness is the foundation of their martial achievements. Conscientiousness and willpower, combined with reliability, greatly strengthen the drive for independence, although they diminish empathy. Artistic talent is particularly pronounced in the field of "sculptural form design." The Nordic person has a great preference for sports and competition; they stand where there is a need to take risks. Therefore, they are also more frequently found in professions associated with danger than other people. The Nordic person is the epitome of achievement.
It is our most sacred duty to promote the Nordic race in our people. Mixing with distant races (alien races) must be avoided under all circumstances.
The race, its preservation, and strengthening are core issues of our life and the foundation of our worldview.
Race and Culture.
The Fuhrer says in "Mein Kampf":
"Everything we admire today on this earth, science and art, technology and inventions, is the creative product of a few peoples and perhaps originally of one race."
The high cultures created by the Indo-Europeans of the Indians, Persians, Greeks, and Romans clearly reveal the Nordic creative spirit. With the decline of the Nordic leadership class, they too disappeared. Even today, we feel the affinity with these cultures, which are of the same origin.
We are not so presumptuous as to claim that all cultures, even in earlier times, can be attributed solely to the Nordic race. Peoples of other racial compositions have also created cultures. However, we feel completely different when we try to immerse ourselves in the cultures of ancient China, Babylon, or the ancient Indian cultures of the Aztecs (in present-day Mexico) and the Incas (in present-day Peru). These were also advanced cultures; but we feel a undeniable remoteness towards them. The reason for this lies in the creators of these cultures themselves. They are not akin to us but racially alien. A different spirit speaks from them. These differently natured cultures have never reached a similar height as those conditioned by the Nordic spirit.
The civilization of today has arisen under the leadership of people of the Nordic race. This applies, for example, to the new Turkey or the rise of America and the resurgence in the Far East.
At the points of mixture with closely related races, the influence of the Nordic race has had an immensely beneficial effect and has given rise to cultural achievements. The dominant position of the Nordic race is undisputed. Those who cannot or will not align themselves with these facts, determined by nature itself, will be mercilessly left behind in the process of development.
On Heredity
"The stronger must rule and not merge with the weaker, thus sacrificing one's own greatness." (Adolf Hitler, "Mein Kampf")
Every glance into the environment shows us that the descendants resemble their ancestors.
From the seed of a beech tree grows another beech tree, the offspring of a falcon are falcons again. Negroes beget Negroes. Whites always White. Already in small children, relatives note that, for example, the nose was "inherited" from the father, and the eyes from the mother. Other traits emerge later, such as diligence, talent, susceptibility to certain diseases.
That inheritance occurs is an ancient realization of humans. Breeders have always counted on the transmission of certain characteristics and traits, excluding animals or plants with undesirable traits from further breeding. However, it is only in recent decades that it has been known and proven that these are processes governed by laws. Today, we know:
Like all events in nature, inheritance is subject to immutable laws.
The laws of inheritance are equally valid for plants, animals, and humans, just like all other laws of life. In offspring, either the traits of both parents are recognizable, or one parent's trait predominates. Sometimes a trait can be traced through many generations, or it skips entire generations only to suddenly reappear later.
For example, the typically shaped lower lip of the Habsburgs.
Inheritance is thus the passing on of traits and characteristics from parents to offspring.
Not only physical traits are inherited, but also mental and emotional ones. For each trait, a person possesses two genetic factors. The child receives these factors in equal parts from the parents.
Animal and plant breeding demonstrates the effectiveness of these factors. They can either be equivalent or different. Often, one factor is stronger than the other. The stronger factor dominates over the weaker one, meaning that in this case, the weaker factor may be present but not visible or expressed.
The stronger factor is dominant, while the weaker one is recessive.
An organism carrying both these factors does not outwardly show that it also simultaneously carries the weaker factor. Only the dominant factor is expressed and becomes visible to us.
Only when the same genetic factors from both parents come together are the offspring purebred.
However, if the factors are different, the result of their combination is a hybrid or crossbreed.
A hybrid may, due to possessing dominant traits, resemble a purebred individual in its appearance. What appears outwardly healthy may harbor hidden genetic predispositions to diseases. One cannot discern the traits present in a person solely by appearance. Any purely external assessment is not conclusive.
Two different races differ in a large number of genetic traits. When they mix (crossbreed), the traits are randomly combined, resulting in a great variety of genetic inheritance in the offspring.
The laws of inheritance are precisely defined mathematically. They form the foundation of our understanding of the formation and progression of generational outcomes. Normal and pathological traits are passed on to offspring with equal strength. Hence, the tremendous importance of understanding genetic traits and the obligation to intervene and contribute to the shaping of future generations.
With fertilization, i.e., the fusion of the sperm and egg cells, the genetic makeup of the individual is definitively established. The further development of the embryo into a human in the womb is irrelevant for the genetic material.
With conception, the essence and value of the individual for their volk and race are already determined.
While upbringing and environment can later develop and nurture certain traits, the core essence remains unchanged.
The responsibility for the future generation lies with us.
Crucial for the advancement of our people is not only answering the question, "Who inherits?" but especially "What is inherited?"
Inheritance Mutation.
Nature teaches us, alongside the immutable laws of inheritance, the possibility of forming new, divergent norms. Science has so far only provided inadequate explanations for this phenomenon. Occasionally, in plants and animals, a new form suddenly appears that is heritably stable. Favorable and unfavorable traits emerge with equal strength and randomly. However, the unfavorable forms eventually perish in the struggle for existence. They are eradicated.
An example of the occurrence of a favorable inheritance mutation: Shorebirds, in which webbed feet emerge through inheritance mutation, over time become typical waterfowl. The new, favorable trait supports them in the struggle for existence. For foraging, they no longer rely solely on the shoreline. They have an advantage over those species that have not transitioned to aquatic life.
Or: Many small islands in the Pacific Ocean carried winged insects, offering the wind a good surface for attack, into the sea, where they perished, while wingless forms that arose through inheritance mutation were able to survive.
Inherited changes are called inheritance mutations. The inheritance mutations observed in humans so far are predominantly unfavorable. Almost always, they are deformities that suddenly appear and then prove to be heritable. Every newly occurring inheritance mutation requires a preceding transformation of the genetic material as a prerequisite.
Today, there is already knowledge of a number of toxins that adversely affect the germ cells and even cause pathological changes in them. The effect of such toxins on the germ cells or the developing embryo is called germ cell damage. Whether such toxins alter the genetic material itself, thus causing an inheritance mutation, is still unclear.
The effects of alcohol and nicotine on offspring are alarming. Just look at the children of drinkers, and you will be shocked. How often they are afflicted with defects and diseases, both physical and mental. The mortality rate among children of alcoholics is incredibly high (Fig. 4).
Studies by G. v. Bunge on the influence of alcohol on children yielded the following values:
The father’s alcohol consumption was not habitual, habitual, and heavy drinkers with the results for every 100 fathers with concern to tuberculous children and mentally ill are
Not habitual drinkers at 6.4 (tuberculous children) and 4.3 (mentally ill children).
Habitual drinkers at 17.1 (tuberculous children) and 11.1 (mentally ill children).
And heavy drinkers at 24.2 (tuberculous children) and 22.2 (mentally ill children).
We must not forget that individuals prone to alcoholism already have inferior genetic traits (Fig. 5).
Similarly, the suffering among the offspring of sexually transmitted disease sufferers is very high. One of the most well-known diseases of this kind is syphilis. The belief that this scourge of humanity is inherited is incorrect. There is only congenital syphilis, meaning this disease is transmitted to the child in the womb. One-third of children born to syphilitic parents die in the womb, and a quarter die during the first 6 weeks. The remaining offspring are plagued with severe deformities and diseases for life. A common consequence among children of affected parents is congenital deafness and muteness (Fig. 6).
MENTAL ILLNESS, ALCOHOLISM, EPILEPSY
Fig 4. Degenerate Inheritance and Offspring.
Ernst Medeis's mother had to be sterilized herself. Her father was an alcoholic and mentally ill. She herself suffered from epilepsy. Her brother is a criminal. She gave birth to four illegitimate children. Of these, only one is normal, the others are feebleminded. The degenerate inheritance from her father takes its toll on her and her children!
Fig. 5. Sick Parents - Sick Children
The Klima couple has seven children, all of whom suffer from their father's speech defect. One daughter has also inherited epilepsy from the mother. The feeblemindedness of some children is attributed to the father's account of "alcoholism."
After us! And what about the next generation?
Fig. 6. Germ Damage Due to Venereal Disease
Until his sixth year of life, Ernst appeared to be healthy. Suddenly, he developed a skin rash that ate away at his face. After a year, he died. His mother had already had four stillbirths before his birth. His father was syphilitic and had poisoned the germs each time. The father's illness originated from his premarital days.
After us, we and the next generation
The danger of an unfavorable genetic change in humans is further intensified by the fact that such changes are often inherited in a masked manner. They only come to light after many generations. An example of this is hemophilia. It occurs only in the male sex. Even with a minor injury (such as tooth extraction), prolonged bleeding occurs, which often leads to a fatal outcome. In numerous European dynasties of the past, which engaged in consanguineous marriages, male descendants were eradicated by hemophilia.
Environment and Genetic Traits.
Every person carries a great treasure of genetic traits from birth.
During their lifetime, only a portion of these traits are realized. The environment plays a role in shaping individuals. Climate, nutrition, living space, social status, and so on can visibly influence human development.
Appearance may undergo some changes as a result, but not genetic makeup. This remains unaffected by the environment.
From this, the following important observations arise:
1. Every person is shaped by the interaction of genetic traits and the environment.
2. The environment and its influence have no effect on offspring.
3. Acquired traits are not inherited.
The last observation is of particularly fundamental significance. While physical exercise can significantly strengthen an individual's muscles, the athlete's son does not inherit stronger muscles than any average child. Similarly, intellectual wealth is not inherited. The offspring of a scholar must start learning the alphabet just like any other child. The same applies to the native language, which has been practiced for many generations.
Marxists and democrats have imaginatively believed, and overestimated the impact of the environment, thinking that by changing this environment, they could improve the fate of entire nations. They consider all people equal. Therefore, under the same conditions, whites, blacks, and yellows should achieve the same accomplishments in all areas.
But we know:
People of different races and species can never fully assimilate, even in the same living space and over vast periods of time. They always remain what they are: foreign blood, which must be kept out of our nation's body, lest it slowly but inevitably succumb to destruction.
Race Mixing.
The "unreasonable" animal only mates with members of the same race for reproduction. Nature-oriented people like the Germanic tribes, the earthy, rooted farmer who feels the voice of race and blood, act out of the same instinct. Only the "over-rational" cultured human believes he can act against nature. This is always to his detriment. When two different races mix, the hereditary traits never merge into a new genetic mass that is uniformly passed on. Instead, the traits of such bastards diverge again during reproduction and distribute among the different offspring. Even though it's possible in animal or plant breeding to create new forms and breeds, called cultivated races, through crossbreeding, this is by no means proof of the possibility of breeding new human races in the same way.
The circumstances are fundamentally different for animal and plant breeding. The breeder pursues very specific intentions in crossbreeding. He aims for a breeding goal. Above all, he has the possibility to breed large numbers of generations in short periods. Among the many forms, the breeder can selectively intervene according to his own judgment. Thus, the probability of obtaining the desired forms with new characteristics, so-called new combinations, increases. Indeed, it frequently succeeds in breeding a new race in just a few years using this method.
The situation is entirely different for humans. The immense number of hereditary traits makes the process of inheritance much more complicated. Additionally, each generation takes a long time (about 30 years). Over many centuries, a selection process would have to be carried out in humans to obtain a new combination. But who could guarantee the retention of the selection direction, and how would the selection of the remaining people be conducted?
Such a plan is simply unfeasible for humans; the breeding of a new race is impossible.
Every race mixing alters the harmonious racial picture. A Nordic head on an Eastern body appears unattractive. Added to that are all the disadvantages on the health and especially the spiritual level that result from racial mixing.
Mixed-race individuals are physically and spiritually disharmonious. The result of every racial mixing is a racial mixture.
Racial mixing signifies a slow decline of the high-quality race and thus the definite loss of the ethnic character. The consequences of harmful racial mixing are unequivocally taught to us by history.
From the moment a people lose their racial consciousness, moral, intellectual, and cultural decline sets in. Indeed, favorable racial mixtures are recognized, depending on the degree of kinship.
"The greatest of the people are not of mixed foreign race, but those in whom the predominant race finds its purest expression." (According to Graf)
Regarding racial mixing, the Fuhrer says:
"Blood mixing and the resulting decline in racial quality are the sole cause of the demise of ancient cultures."
A number of cultural peoples exhibit the following consistent developmental trajectory, which by no means represents a law of nature:
After a slow ascent to a certain height, there follows a brief period of flourishing, then a rapid decline. This decline is almost always initiated by the replacement of simplicity, sobriety, and health with indulgence, instability, and diseases. Simultaneously, bloody wars eliminate the most valuable carriers, while child poverty further reduces the number of capable individuals. However, the fatal blow is struck by mixing with foreign blood. This results in greater internal conflicts. In such disunity, it becomes easy for a more vigorous people to emerge victorious.
Up to the present day, the Jews have avoided complete mixing with their host nations and maintained their consciousness of blood.
Characteristic is the statement by the English Jew Disraeli: "Every race must perish that carelessly gives up its blood."
The Nordic race is the carrier and foundation of the German people.
Nature teaches us as the highest law: The individual is not the end but the means of life.
The German people are not merely a sum of 85 million individuals but a great unity, a community in which Nordic heritage predominates. This heritage is manifested not only in physical appearance but primarily in a unified racial soul. It is not only the physically Nordic characteristics of the individual that are decisive, though desired, but also their soulful and character traits.
The Nordic race is the race of the German people. It stamps our essence, determining our thoughts, actions, and feelings.
Thus, your destiny is inseparably linked to your great blood community.
Soldierhood and Race.
Every race forms types. It possesses specific, outstanding traits that enable it to excel in certain areas. Furthermore, there is a typification throughout the entire nation. Nowhere is this standardization better demonstrated than in the warrior of the nation.
Every nation has a soldier type.
The inner strength and demeanor of an individual, the readiness for attack or defense and for sacrifice, racially inherited characteristics, they constitute his soldierhood.
The German soldier is oriented according to Prussianism, which in its strictness and forcefulness, in its leadership structure and in its concept of honor, is unmistakably Nordic. In the pursuit of independence, an essential characteristic of the German, lies the success of the self-reliant German soldier.
The German soldier is unparalleled as an individual combatant. However, the mass is capable of unimaginable achievements when it feels above it the unbending, tough will and the leadership personality of Nordic imprint. For the German soldier, who is geared towards a goal, towards action, defense merely signifies a makeshift.
The German combat style is the attack.
Quite different, for example, is the Frenchman. He is primarily a fighter in the mass, less proficient as an individual combatant. In "safety", in defense, he feels his true combat form.
Selection and Breeding
"If the strength to fight for one's own health is no longer present, the right to life in this world of struggle ends." (Adolf Hitler, "Mein Kampf")
Any wise state leadership that consciously pursues population policy and racial hygiene must see its main task in implementing measures to secure the continuity and racial breeding.
Changes in heredity and environment would bring forth new races or subspecies in corresponding periods if there were not a force that acted restrictively. The process of splitting into countless races is naturally limited by selection. In the wild, beings unsuitable for the preservation of the race are eliminated, while carriers of favorable traits remain.
For example: Among mammals and birds in polar regions, the white, long-haired forms almost always survive compared to the similar dark-colored ones. They are protected solely because of their more appropriate coloration against their enemies.
Selection maintains the race at an old level.
If new traits arise through changes in the genetic material of individual organisms, representing an enrichment of favorable characteristics, then such organisms have an advantage over the unchanged racial comrades. They strive more strongly for perfection and gradually displace those beings that remain at the same stage of development.
Selection acts progressively.
The evolutionary development of all living beings in nature occurs solely through hereditary variation and selection. The further possibility of the emergence of new races through new formations is completely irrelevant to humans. The death of the individual has nothing to do with the nature of selection but is only a means to it. Essential for eradication is that no genetic material is passed on. Then, in the next generation, this genetic material is no longer strongly represented.
It is entirely irrelevant whether eradication is brought about by sterilization or abstinence, by death, or in any other way.
The only biologically significant selection is fertility.
A person who has no children, no matter how old they become, is forever erased from the life of the race. Fertility alone determines the continuity of the genetic material.
"Not societal, social, and economic successes determine the struggle for existence in humans. The ultimate victory goes to those who have the most children. The struggle for existence is a battle for the most children; it is a reproductive struggle, a birth struggle" (Siemens).
Mate Selection.
The choice of a racially superior wife alone does not mean an improvement in the race. Such improvement occurs only when the right choice of spouse is followed by the conception of an above-average number of children. For what good would it do to eliminate bad genetic material from the population if, at the same time, there is not also an increase in the propagation of good traits?
For example, if mate selection is made by a high-quality man who does not desire children, it actually means a deterioration of the race because it results in the exclusion of good genetic material from future generations.
The triumph of fertility and the more rapid succession of generations.
The influence of average fertility on the survival of a race is immense. With unequal reproduction rates between two coexisting or intermingling races, the race with fewer children is condemned to extinction after just a few generations. Even a slight difference in average fertility is enough to cause a significant shift over a longer period of time (see Figure 7).
The importance of marriage age should not be underestimated, as it greatly influences the number of children. The renewal of generations, i.e., the faster succession of generations, is also a crucial factor in the shifting composition of a population. The effects of an early or late marriage age become visible after a short time. Experience teaches us that the number of children is greater in early marriages than in later ones.
Thus, over the course of 3 generations in 100 years with 4 children each, there are 64 descendants, and over the course of 4 generations in 100 years with 4 children each, there are 256 descendants (see Figure 8).
A poignant example of the necessity of the birth victory of racially more valuable people can be seen in the post-war conditions of our nation (see Figure 9).
In the years following the World War, in Germany, there were indeed twice as many children born to a criminal marriage as to a respectable family.
Another example, which still applies to many non-European regions today:
Fig. 7. Let's assume that half of the population has two children and the other half has five children per marriage, then after just five generations, such a shift in favor of the more fertile population group would result in it rising to 99%.
In an area inhabited by whites and blacks, the ratio between them is 1:1. To illustrate how this ratio shifts in favor of the blacks, let's consider an example from the South African Union:
For every 100 blacks, there are 5 children, while for every 100 whites, there are 2.6 children.
With this development, in 100 years, there are already 16 blacks for every white, and in 300 years, there are even 40% blacks for every white.
A similar problem has increasingly come to the forefront in Europe itself in recent decades. The decline of France, politically and demographically weakening France, was a consequence of being foolish and irresponsible enough to grant equal citizenship rights to the "Blacks". Tens of thousands of these people, whom they allowed to freely engage in racial defilement.
The Führer warned of this danger "of the emergence of an African state on European soil" years ago and stated:
"What France is doing in Europe today is a sin against the existence of the white race."
Fig. 8. Population shift with the same number of children but different rates of generational succession.
If two population groups, initially in a 50:50 ratio, were renewed by childbirth every 33 years for one group and every 25 years for the other, under the assumption that the first group undergoes renewal through childbirth every 33 years while the second group undergoes renewal every 25 years, then the group with the faster generational succession would encompass 90 out of 100 people in the population after 300 years.
Only the victory of our arms now gives us the opportunity to rectify the mistakes of others in this space and to shape a better future for Europe in terms of race.
If valuable hereditary traits are to be preserved in a population, then their carriers must exhibit at least the same fertility as the carriers of less desirable traits. This requirement presupposes that both groups of genetic masses are equally represented. However, the carriers of high-quality genetic material are almost always in the minority. Therefore, a significant increase in their fertility is necessary to prevent any decline.
Every selection that affects a population has a lasting and irrevocable success or failure.
The successes of plant and animal breeding are solely the result of proper selection and propagation of the best genetic strains. With this understanding, we also comprehend the main cause of the downfall of ancient civilizations. Among them, the capable carriers of heredity, the bearers of culture and creators, have been eliminated. The inferior have achieved the greatest conceivable victory over them: the victory of childbirth.
In the Persian Wars, Sparta still had 8,000 men capable of bearing arms in 500 B.C., but by 244 B.C., it had only 700.
The decline of Sparta and the collapse of Rome were nothing more than a cessation of the fertility of the genetically capable.
On Inbreeding
By inbreeding, we mean the reproduction of blood-related parents.
The animal breeder often uses blood-related forms to achieve a specific breeding goal. However, he is sufficiently informed about the hereditary makeup of his breeding animals.
We generally know too little about the hereditary makeup of individual humans to predict the consequences of a consanguineous marriage from the outset.
If the blood-related partners are free of unhealthy hereditary traits, then inbreeding has no harmful effects. The very common damages in children of blood-related parents always result from the coincidence of identical, pathological traits. Previously hidden disease traits are intensified by the combination of genetic material from both parents, leading to the manifestation of the disease in the offspring. There is no danger to the race in this regard. To some extent, the adverse effects of inbreeding are also beneficial because they reveal previously hidden undesirable traits. Through appropriate selection, a purification process can then be carried out, which can only benefit the overall population. Similarly, there is a great possibility that through inbreeding, identical, good traits may coincide. In this case, the offspring exhibit the relevant good characteristics to a heightened degree.
Inbreeding doubles the good and doubles the bad!
Good Blood - Eternal Source
WHO BEGETS THE NEXT GENERATION?
Fig. 9. Let valuable genetic material continue to propagate in as many children as possible!
In a nation, if two groups exhibit different fertility rates and furthermore, the more fertile group possesses inferior hereditary traits, then the scenario unfolds as follows: Starting with an initially equal status, but with double the fertility, the criminal, inferior population grows to encompass 90% of the total population after just 100 years.
Counterselection and Degeneration.
The degeneration of a race or ultimately an entire nation is based on the progressive deterioration of its genetic material. If decline is to be prevented, it is necessary to identify the reasons for degeneration. Only the precise understanding of the causes of degeneration gives us the opportunity for successful combat.
It is a fact that almost all cultured nations, especially those of Nordic-Germanic influence, serve as an example of counterselection in terms of fertility. That means:
The fertility of the genetically capable is lower than that of the less capable.
Experience teaches us that the frequency of hereditary mental illnesses is greater among the less capable than among the genetically capable. However, the constantly unequal reproduction of the gifted and less gifted leads to a reduction in outstanding hereditary traits within the population and inevitably signifies its cultural degradation.
In the past, the fundamentally incorrect view was often held that higher aptitude remained confined to certain "classes" of the population.
"Aptitude is not a monopoly of a social class."
(Siemens)
In the National Socialist state, selection and state support are therefore based not on "classes" or "social classes", but solely on ability and performance, efficiency, and attitude. The National Political Educational Institutes, the Adolf Hitler Schools, the Langemarck Study, and the Order Castles are living proof of this. They produce the future leaders of the German people in all fields.
The low fertility of Nordic-influenced peoples contrasts with the high reproduction rates, especially of those European peoples with Asian influences.
In 1933, the natural population increase of Germany was approximately 66 million inhabitants, 233,297.
In 1933, the natural population increase of Poland was approximately 32 million inhabitants, 402,465.
The danger of a racial change in Europe is significant! There is still time to avert it!
War and Counterselection.
Every war represents a counterselection in its purest form. It is precisely the most capable and efficient individuals who lose their lives on the battlefields. Germany lost 2 million of its best men in World War I. Three million people fell victim to enemy hunger blockade. Forty percent of all active officers, representing a high-quality selection of Nordic people, fell from 1914 to 1918. Over half of the students who went to the front did not return.
The losses of aviators, who were of the highest quality, were also significant. The same applies to the aviators of enemy states. They too were largely of the Nordic race and, due to their particularly dangerous missions, suffered the highest losses.
War destroys not only the best genetic material but also preserves the inferior.
Furthermore, there is the loss of births. The World War cost Germany 3.5 million children who were not born.
Only a people with the will to live and healthy can successfully overcome such a loss.
The Führer on the war and its overcoming from a population policy perspective:
"The successful outcome of this war will pose challenges to the German Reich that it can only fulfill by increasing its population. It is therefore necessary that the gaps created in the body of the nation by the war be filled through population growth."
From the order of the Reichsführer of October 28, 1939:
"For some nations, victories in war were at the same time a devastating defeat of their vitality and blood. The unfortunately necessary death of the best men, regrettable as it is, is not yet the worst. Much worse is the absence of children not conceived during the war by the living and after the war by the dead."
The fight against inferior genetic material—State measures.
The Führer says in "Mein Kampf":
"Those who are not physically and mentally healthy and worthy must not perpetuate their suffering in the body of their child."
Above our actions stands the community of the people.
It is an untenable situation when in a state the relationship between the productive and the non-earning class takes on unhealthy forms. The active, hardworking part of the population must support the lives of cripples and the incurably ill. Officially, the following findings on welfare in a city in Germany were made in 1932:
A social pensioner received annually 244 RM.
A small pensioner received 433 RM.
A "welfare non-earner" received 500 RM.
Mentally ill, idiots, blind, crippled, deaf-mute individuals received per capita 1,944 RM.
There are lunatics who have cost the state tens of thousands of marks. In 1926, Germany saw 570 murders, 810 robberies, 6,800 cases of debauchery and rape. These criminals cost the state many millions of marks. Some of them have also reproduced. By eliminating these individuals, a huge sum can be saved and made available for other purposes.
State measures must serve solely the preservation and promotion of the valuable population and its best race.
The state must also ensure that on the one hand, inferior genetic material is not preserved, while on the other hand, the valuable material is not reproduced so weakly that its existence appears endangered for the people.
Whoever is aware of their hereditary burden and still produces useless offspring violates the laws of life in the most egregious manner. They sin against their people and their race.
Where this sense of responsibility towards the community is lacking, it is the duty of the state to intervene in these perceived "rights" of the individual.
Those who do not voluntarily conform to this moral order forfeit the right to special protection.
It is imperative that individuals who rely on the strength of others in vain and for whom life itself is a torment should not be born. Every natural community, in proper understanding, soon eliminates the inferior.
Among the so-called "cultured peoples," a false sense of charity, especially promoted by ecclesiastical circles, has actively encouraged reverse selection.
From a religious perspective, any reasonable intervention is branded as a violation of divine order. However, it is more than surprising why these authorities do not also oppose the slaughter of animals or any medical intervention.
It is absurd to claim that what we label as inferior is willed by God. Otherwise, we would have no right to deprive a murderer or criminal of their freedom, and every decent person would be at the mercy of such atrocities.
Natural laws and their understanding clearly demonstrate that the life of our people and the preservation of its bloodline take precedence over the well-being of those heavily burdened by heredity.
The measure must not be based on personal ego but solely on the welfare of the nation as a whole.
Furthermore, the following empirical facts also apply: Most hereditarily diseased individuals lack a sense of responsibility towards their offspring. There is a complete lack of insight.
In the year 1877, 40,375 individuals were cared for in German mental asylums; in 1926, there were 252,793 individuals. In the USA, the percentage of mentally ill individuals more than doubled from 1904 to 1929.
National Socialism has logically intervened here as well.
The Führer's stance is reflected in his words:
"The demand that defective individuals be prevented from procreating other equally defective individuals is a demand of the clearest reason and, in its systematic implementation, represents the most humane act of humanity. It will spare millions of the unfortunate undeserved suffering and, consequently, lead to increasing health."
On July 14, 1933, the German government enacted the "Law for the Prevention of Hereditarily Diseased Offspring." The law determines:
1. Those who are hereditarily diseased can be made infertile (sterilized) through surgical intervention if, according to the experience of medical science, it is highly likely that their offspring will suffer from severe physical or mental hereditary defects.
2. Hereditarily diseased, as defined by the law, includes those suffering from one of the following diseases:
- Congenital feeblemindedness.
- Schizophrenia (schizophrenia): mental illness with a complete change in personality, emotional numbness, isolation from the outside world.
- Circular insanity: mental illness with alternating states of excitement and melancholy, hereditary epilepsy (fallsickness), hereditary St. Vitus' dance, hereditary blindness, hereditary deafness, severe physical deformity.
3. Furthermore, those suffering from severe alcoholism can also be made infertile.
The decision on sterilization is made by the Hereditary Health Court.
One of numerous examples illustrating the necessity of these measures in the correct light (according to A. Drechsler, timeframe: several years before the assumption of power).
"The family of a railroad switchman. The father drank and died of tuberculosis. The mother is dissolute and incompatible. Two sons and two daughters are present. 26-year-old Helene is suffering from syphilis. She has two children, one currently in the hospital, the other in private care at the city's expense. 24-year-old Alfred is infected with syphilis, has infected his fiancée, and has fathered four children with her. 18-year-old Melanie, like her brother Kurt, has been infected with syphilis by others. Alfred has become a scourge of humanity. He is a small, frail fellow, but rough and brutal, lazy and dissolute. He has lived solely on public support and health insurance. Not only because of his tuberculosis is he a danger to his surroundings, but even more so because of syphilis. He had met a woman investor who was also supported by the welfare office. For 6 years, the two have been going to the same counter to collect their support. Every year it increases slightly because the family grows. They already have four children, tainted with syphilis and tuberculosis."
The sterilized individual suffers no physical impairment aside from the loss of fertility.
With this legislation, the necessary beginning of the purification process of the national body has been completed. The effect of this law will be felt in the next generation. It was a decision of immeasurable importance when the National Socialist state decisively put an end to the impossible situation.
A second law addresses the fact that habitual criminals have offspring heavily burdened by heredity. On November 24, 1933, the "Law against Dangerous Habitual Criminals and Measures of Security and Improvement" was created. This law eliminates certain antisocial elements from the national body.
The most effective legislation in the shortest time is the establishment of the "Nuremberg Laws" of September 15, 1935. It is the "Law for the Protection of German Blood and German Honor".
(See Fig. 10.)
This law protects the German national community from the mixing with alien blood in perpetuity. It simultaneously determines who can become a citizen of the Reich. With this law, a sudden halt was put to the already advanced racial degeneration of the German people.
Fig. 10. Legal protection against alien Judaism
Another measure is the "Law for the Protection of the Genetic Health of the German People" (Marriage Health Law) of October 18, 1935. It prohibits marriage between sick individuals, thereby preventing the transmission of diminished genetic material to offspring.
National Socialist Germany, of course, faced fierce attacks from the hostile, Jewish-led foreign powers, although the Reich is not alone in the world in implementing these measures. Many states in the USA took legal measures several decades ago to prevent the increase of inferior genetic material. Legal provisions in this regard were established in some states of the USA as early as 1926, and in Denmark and parts of Switzerland in 1929. In California, nearly 9,000 people have been made infertile in the last 20 years.
The demographic development of Germany.
After a brief increase in birth rates in the decades following the war of 1870/71, birth rates gradually declined until the turn of the century and then more rapidly.
Causes of the decline in births.
They are primarily of a psychological nature. The decline in births began especially in affluent circles, where reluctance to raise a corresponding number of children arose from comfort and pursuit of pleasure. The broad masses then followed this example. Today, this trend must be reversed, and the number of children must increase particularly strongly in the better-off circles (see Fig. 11).
Birth rate development.
After the war of 1870/71, there were annually '40 births per 1000 inhabitants in Germany.
Around the turn of the century, there were only '35 births per 1000 inhabitants annually.
At the beginning of the World War, there were approximately '27 births per 1000 inhabitants annually.
The birth rate reached its lowest point during the World War, where '14 births per 1000 inhabitants occurred annually.
Fig. 11. Only the increase in birth rates secures the future of our people.
Even more alarming is the following picture of the decline in births.
In 1870, with approximately 42 million inhabitants, there were about 2 million births.
In 1933, with approximately 65 million inhabitants, there were about 0.9 million births.
A tremendous turnaround came with the altered, reinvigorated psychological attitude following the assumption of power by National Socialism (Fig. 11). The birth rate was:
In 1933, 14.7 births per 1000 inhabitants.
In 1935, 19.9 births per 1000 inhabitants.
In 1938, 19.7 births per 1000 inhabitants.
In 1939, 20.8 births per 1000 inhabitants.
This positive turnaround, however, by no means eliminates the danger to the future of our people. The aforementioned figures do not yet ensure the necessary increase.
If we want to accurately understand demographic trends, we must consider not only birth rates but also mortality.
Despite the continuous decline in births since 1870, apart from ineffective migration, the population of Germany increased numerically. How is this possible? The steadily decreasing death rates provide the answer (see Fig. 11).
In 1870, approximately 28 out of 1000 inhabitants died.
In 1900, approximately 23 out of 1000 inhabitants died.
In 1927, approximately 12 out of 1000 inhabitants died.
In 1932, approximately 11 out of 1000 inhabitants died.
Improved living conditions, increased hygiene, and especially the achievements of modern medicine have significantly reduced mortality rates among the German population and increased life expectancy compared to earlier times.
All these factors ultimately created a completely false picture of the nature of Germany's population increase. The increase in average age in recent decades is the true cause of the population growth.
The healthy growth of a nation should not be determined by an increase in life expectancy but only by a lasting surplus of births.
Marriages.
They show a slow increase, except for the natural decrease during the World War, only to rise significantly with the victory of the National Socialist worldview. It was the social measures of the new Germany that laid the necessary foundations for increased marriage and family formation.
In 1932, there were 7.9 marriages per 1000 inhabitants.
In 1934, there were 11.2 marriages per 1000 inhabitants.
However, let us not forget that it is not the number of marriages but the fertility of marriage alone that is decisive for the preservation and increase of the population.
In 1894, there were 4.1 children per marriage. In 1914, there were 3.6 children per marriage. In 1926, there were 2.2 children per marriage. In 1930, there were 1.7 children per marriage. (See Fig. 12.)
Each marriage must have four children to ensure the preservation of the nation.
The two-child system means national death. (Image below text)
Fig. 12. The two-child system condemns a people to extinction!
The warning that securing the nation's existence requires two children per marriage is a fallacy. To obtain a correct picture, the mortality rates of children must also be considered. Furthermore, it must be acknowledged that some marriages remain childless and that through the law for the prevention of hereditarily diseased offspring and other measures (marriage counseling), a (though inferior) portion is excluded from the genetic pool. This purely mathematical calculation shows that each fertile marriage must have more than three children.
Words of the Führer:
"Marriage cannot be an end in itself but must serve a greater purpose, the propagation and preservation of the species and race."
"The state must ensure that the fertility of healthy women is not restricted...”
The three basic forms in the age structure of a population:
1. The healthy, growing population:
It exhibits an age structure in which each younger age group is more strongly represented than the next older one. If people of a certain age group are depicted as horizontal layers, a healthy population takes on the shape of a pyramid with a broad base and a narrow apex.
2. The stagnant population:
If the birth rate of a population no longer increases significantly, then the age groups up to 45 years have approximately the same strength. The graphical representation leads to the bell-shaped curve.
3. The shrinking population:
It resembles an urn. The birth rate decreases more and more each year, and older people become predominant. (According to Burgdörfer.) (See Fig. 13.)
Let us compare these basic forms with the age structure of the German population. (See Fig. 14, 15, 16, 17.)
The danger of aging.
The age structure of our population up to the assumption of power clearly shows a reduction in the birth rate and an advancement of the older cohorts.
If a population does not rejuvenate, it is heading towards aging. It becomes an old population. The working-age population decreases, while the non-working, support-needing population increases. The social burdens become increasingly greater.
In 1930, there were 9 support-needing individuals over 65 years old for every 100 working-age individuals (aged 15 to 65).
If the favorable changes since 1933 do not continue, by 1980 there would already be 25 support-needing individuals for every 100 working-age individuals.
Based on the population development until 1933, the following picture emerges:
In 1910, Germany had 5 million people over 60 years old, by 1990 Germany would have 11 million people over 65 years old.
THE THREE BASIC FORMS IN THE AGE STRUCTURE OF A POPULATION (text from the below image)
Fig. 13. Not aging or shrinking, but rather becoming a growing population must be the fate of the German people! Presentation shown in horizontal strips. Each strip corresponds to the living individuals of a specific age group. (According to Grund-Burgoorter)
AGE STRUCTURE OF THE GERMAN REICH 1910 (below image top text)
Fig. 14. In 1910, Germany was a populous and demographically healthy nation. At that time, Germany was a growing, youthful nation because the number of children was considerable. However, the sharp decline in births drastically altered the landscape in just a few years. (According to Burgdörter)
AGE STRUCTURE 1933
Fig. 15. This was the picture at the time of the National Socialist takeover.
After 1920, birth rates plummeted rapidly. The image approached the shape of an urn. The number of people in middle and older age groups increased, while the number of children declined alarmingly. If the favorable increase in births since 1933 does not continue, the outlook for the future looks very bleak. (According to Burgdörfer)
Fig. 16. Only National Socialism could prevent this decline of our people. If National Socialism had not transformed the German people back into a population eager to have children, then the development would have followed the path shown by the images of the age structure in 1945, 1960, and 1975. (According to Vol. 401 of the Statistics of the German Reich)
Fig. 17. Everyone, including you, must do everything possible to ensure that our population pyramid is once again based on a broad foundation! (According to Burgsdrfer)
The immense performance of the Reich largely relies on the currently favorable distribution of the working-age population.
URBANIZATION
There is still time to save the Reich from biological-racial death if we contribute to making the German people "the most youthful nation in a few years" (Astei).
Decline in Births and Loss of Talent.
The majority of the most significant men in Germany show us that they are not to be found among the first-born in large families:
Schiller, Beethoven were at 2 children
Dürer, Robert Koch, Ludendorff at 3
Frederick the Great, Kant, Bismarck, Boelke at 4
Kleist, Rembrandt, Baron von Stein at 5
Mozart, Blücher at 7
Prince Eugene, J. S. Bach, Weddigen at 8
Wagner, Siemens at 9
Händel at 10
Schubert at 13
The dangers of rural exodus — the infertile metropolis.
During the last decades, urbanization took on increasingly stronger forms. Hand in hand with this was the decline in births. Through progressive industrialization, valuable human resources were continuously drawn away from the countryside (Fig. 18).
In 1930, there were 21 births per 1000 people in the rural population, while at the same time, there were only 13 births per 1000 people in the metropolis. The big cities have the lowest birth rates.
Cities are graveyards of the nation!
In 1927, Berlin had 9.9 births per 1000 inhabitants,
In 1931, Berlin had 8.7 births per 1000 inhabitants.
In 1930, Vienna had 10.0 births per 1000 inhabitants.
If the capital of the Reich were left to its own devices under the same circumstances and did not experience a constant influx from the countryside, then by the year 2050 (assuming the population development before the takeover of power), Berlin would have only about 100,000 inhabitants (population in 1937: 4,250,000) and would be subject to desertion and decay. The problem of rural exodus needs urgent resolution, especially for the settlement area in the East. Only a German peasantry can form the insurmountable barrier against the onslaught of eastern peoples.
URBANIZATION OF THE GERMAN PEOPLE
RURAL EXODUS MEANS NATIONAL DEATH!
Fig. 18. Is this how it will continue? Rural exodus is national death!
Great power politics - Race - Fertility
History proves to us through numerous examples that only when a nation has enough people at its disposal can it pursue great power politics. The larger the controlled territory, the greater the need for people to protect this space (soldiers), secure food production (farmers), and generate industrial products (workers). All nations that, for whatever internal reasons, were no longer able to simultaneously strengthen their power and increase their national strength, have fallen to destruction. Let's take a look at the fertility of European peoples:
In 1936-37, Germany had 19.4 births per 1000 inhabitants, while Sweden had 14.2, Norway had 15.1, and England had 15.5. In contrast, Poland had 26.2 (formerly), Romania had 31.5, and Ukraine had 34.0.
The Russian people increase annually by about 3 million. In the Asian region, Japan has doubled its population in the last 70 years, with an annual growth of about one million people. Similarly, China and India continue to increase their populations incessantly despite many famines and epidemics.
Due to their higher fertility rates, the eastern peoples of Slavic language pose a great danger to us.
If we do not take care of the corresponding offspring ourselves and bring about a strengthening of the Nordic heritage, Nordic blood will increasingly be displaced by the eastern and East Baltic.
The Nordic race, or we can also say the Germanic peoples, rank last in terms of fertility. However, the number of births determines the fate of nations.
The German victory of arms is only complete when it is followed by a victory of the child.
Fig. 19. The danger of the great fertility of the Eastern peoples of Slavic language
"Two ramparts stand in the struggle for existence available to every nation: Its defensive strength and its natural fertility. Never forget that defensive strength alone cannot enable a nation to survive far into the future, but that the inexhaustible source of its fertility is necessary for this." (The Reichsführer-SS)
The victory of National Socialism.
Adolf Hitler has guided the German people back onto the path of life. Thanks to the breakthrough of the National Socialist idea, the national will of the Germans has been immensely strengthened. Never before has a man succeeded in voluntarily gaining such approval.
The fight against degeneration has begun. For us, there can only be a victorious end to this war, which ensures the existence of the German people for all eternity.
Population policy measures in the new Germany.
The National Socialist government fights against birth control. Legal measures enable marriages to take place to a greater extent.
On June 1, 1933, the Law for the Reduction of Unemployment was already established, and the granting of marriage loans was determined. The preference for large families is put into action. Population policy considerations underlie tax legislation. The same applies to the granting of loans to large families (Child Benefits Ordinance of September 15, 1935). The "Law for the Standardization of Marriage" of April 30, 1938, has great population policy significance. This law regulates the possibility of divorce in case of childlessness. The child benefit ordinance of December 9, 1940, grants the legally stipulated child benefit for the third and each subsequent child. The age limit was raised from 16 to 21 years. There is no income limit for benefits. Another measure to support large families is the establishment of "Mother and Child" within the framework of the National Socialist People's Welfare (NSV). A key tool for preserving the nation lies in returning some urban dwellers to the countryside. The creation of small farms, the connection to the land, is realized in the most generous manner. The Reichserbhofgesetz aims to maintain and increase the healthy peasant class. It stipulates that only an honorable German-blooded farmer can inherit the farm.
5. The Blood Idea in the Movement
The Schutzstaffel consists mainly of Nordic individuals.
The Reichsführer-SS order of December 31, 1931, states in point 1: "The SS is a unit of German, predominantly Nordic individuals selected according to special criteria."
At the core of National Socialism is the concept of race. We have the unwavering belief that blood, genetic heritage, alone determines lasting and best performance. Thus, we prioritize the idea of selection.
The model of selection is the physically and mentally capable individual of Nordic-Germanic descent.
We should not only be a group of the physically fittest but also the most loyal and characteristically valuable.
The kinship community - family care - offspring welfare.
Preserving racially valuable traits for all future generations requires the involvement of family and kin as a natural prerequisite.
Fig. 50. The cradle of our children must be as secure as the foundation of our factories.
The life of the individual connects them with ancestors and descendants. Through the family and kinship, the association with the national community occurs.
The individual dies, subject to the laws of nature.
By passing on their genetic heritage, they become a living part of their national community.
We are deeply imbued with this idea. Our nation is immortal.
Our Führer says about the family:
"The destruction of the family would mean the end of any higher humanity ... It is the smallest but most valuable unit in the structure of the entire state."
The family is the foundation of the Reich.
It produces future generations. Every nationality can only be renewed from the family. From the Germanic-German sentiment, we emphasize our kinship idea. In close connection with the laws of life, we must account for improvement through the German family. The family is a part of the meaningful community of the kinship; it is the recognized order of the generation of the next generation.
Mate selection.
We know:
The choice of a spouse gives us the only opportunity in life to improve the genetic material of the next generation.
The health or illness, talent or inability of offspring are decided by the mate selection of ancestors.
In this crucial step in a man's life, position and wealth should not be decisive factors, but rather mental and physical capability alone. It is equally clear that anyone who knows they carry detrimental hereditary traits must abstain.
The Führer says in "Mein Kampf":
"There is no freedom to sin at the expense of future generations and thus the race." (p. 278.)
"What is being pondered from all sides in this area, the nationalist state must enforce. It must place the race at the center of general life. It must ensure purity. It must declare the child the most precious asset of a people. It must ensure that only those who are healthy have children; that there is only one shame: to bring children into the world despite one's own illness and deficiencies..." (p. 446.)
Similarly, it is a lack of responsibility for anyone who, through voluntary abstinence, fails to pass on their good genetic material, thus constricting or even stopping the flow of life.
Performance in one's profession alone is by no means the only thing demanded by the community. Equally important is the fulfillment of biological duty. Both together constitute the German life achievement.
The SS man must marry as early as possible. The mother of his children must be a carrier of valuable blood. Then his family is in every respect an enrichment to the kin and the nation.
The Reichsführer-SS, in a correct understanding of the future shaping of our people, in which we must play a major role, already issued the engagement and marriage order on December 31, 1931.
It reads:
1. The SS is a selected association of German, Nordic-determined men according to special criteria.
2. In accordance with the National Socialist worldview and in the recognition that the future of our people depends on the selection and preservation of racially and genetically healthy blood, I introduce, with effect from January 1, 1932, marriage permission for all unmarried members of the SS.
3. The desired goal is the genetically valuable kin of German, Nordic-determined nature.
4. Marriage permission is granted or refused solely on racial and genetic health grounds.
5. Every SS man intending to marry must obtain marriage permission from the Reichsführer-SS.
6. SS members who marry despite the refusal of marriage permission will be struck off from the SS; resignation is optional for them.
7. The proper processing of marriage applications is the responsibility of the SS Race Office.
8. The SS Race Office maintains the "Kinship Book of the SS", into which the families of SS members are entered after the granting of marriage permission or approval of the registration request.
9. The Reichsführer-SS, the head of the Race Office, and the officials of this office are bound by an oath of confidentiality.
10. The SS is aware that with this order, a step of great significance has been taken. Ridicule, scorn, and misunderstanding do not affect us; the future belongs to us!
Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler.
From the speech of Reichsführer-SS in 1935:
"So we have come forward and march according to immutable laws as a National Socialist, soldierly order of Nordic-determined men and as a sworn community of their kin on the path to a distant future, and we wish and believe, we would not only be the grandchildren who fought it better, but beyond that, the ancestors of the latest, necessary for the eternal life of the Germanic German people."
This sets guidelines for the mate selection of the SS man. This also lays the groundwork for the Schutzstaffel to directly contribute to the formation of the leading kin of future generations.
Lebensborn - Welfare.
Population policy on a racial basis secures Germany's future.
For the successful implementation of these insights, the SS has found a practical solution. Reichsführer-SS Heinrich Himmler created the association "Lebensborn e. V." on December 12, 1935.
"Lebensborn" is an expression of our kinship community. The number of homes, located in the most beautiful parts of the Reich districts, is constantly increasing. The homes of "Lebensborn" are available to all German expectant mothers who are racially and genetically valuable. Help is provided through advice and assistance.
The "Lebensborn" association also actively contributes to solving the problem of illegitimate or premarital children. Even if the father of the child is not a member of the SS, the genetically capable German mother finds the necessary loving care and support in her most difficult hour.
Thus, the Schutzstaffel contributes to understanding matters that concern the entire German people and form a question of life for its future.
The Law on the Care of Widows and Orphans, issued by the Reichsführer on November 7, 1937, is another step towards realizing our concept of kinship community.
Through action, it is demonstrated! The wife and children of a deceased SS comrade have our protection, guidance, and active assistance throughout their lives.
The SS and the destiny of the Nordic race.
History shows us how often the rise and fall of flourishing empires and cultures have occurred over the millennia.
Humanity owes its greatest achievements to the creative power of the Nordic race. Whenever the bearer of this civilization declined, inevitably, decay set in.
In recent centuries, the process of denordization has taken increasingly stronger forms.
Is the decline of the Nordic heritage an inevitable fate?
Our answer is a clear no!
We have recognized the roots of denordization and pointed out the serious dangers surrounding us today. The national-socialist state has correctly identified these dangers. Laws have already been enacted to prevent further decay. Measures have also been initiated to educate our entire nation in this regard. Furthermore, if we truly aim to lead in the Germanic realm, a corresponding direction of all Germanic peoples must be undertaken.
Purposeful nordification must replace denordization.
Biological insight requires a clear separation of races.
We are aware of the disadvantages of racial mixing.
The significant colonizing activity, through the settlement of Nordic farmers in the East, will form a barrier against the advance of Eastern peoples of Slavic language.
The Schutzstaffel is also at the forefront in addressing these vital issues and will fulfill the tasks assigned to it, obeying its laws.
From our standpoint, insight and the will to promote and strengthen the Nordic race will become the common goal of all Nordic-Germanic people.
We know the path that leads to ascent.
We, the men of the Schutzstaffel, carry, alongside the sense of responsibility towards ourselves, primarily the feeling of responsibility towards the people and future generations.
The concept of race is the cornerstone of our worldview. Joyfully, we can already observe today that the Führer has also emerged victorious in this struggle. Adolf Hitler has won this battle, not because he rebelled against the laws of nature, but because he has reinstated them to their rightful place and is willing to remain unconditionally loyal to them.
We aspire to be counted among the best of the leader, and our complete dedication and loyalty belong to him and our people.
Our strength and our spirit will be influential and organizing for the new racial structure of the Germanic peoples of Europe.
Summary of our principles:
1. Protect your health and body, especially during adolescence, by avoiding harmful substances like alcohol, nicotine, and excessive physical exertion.
2. Marry early to fully experience family happiness with your wife.
3. Do not marry a woman from a different race; you are responsible for preserving the purity of your bloodline for your people and descendants.
4. Marry a healthy, genetically sound woman; you bear the responsibility for the health of your children and grandchildren.
5. Choose a thoroughly vetted wife who embodies true health and desirable qualities, as her family reflects her true nature.
6. Your wife should support you as much as you support her.
7. Strive to return to the countryside with your children.
8. Avoid marrying relatives, as unfavorable hereditary traits may remain hidden and manifest doubly in your children.
9. You must ensure the continuation of your genetic heritage for your people by having as many children as possible. You live on through your children.